Aurora & North Aurora

Key challenge: Low proficiency rates in English Language Arts (ELA) and Math.

• Illinois statewide data show that many districts serving Aurora and North Aurora communities struggle to meet proficiency benchmarks in ELA and Math, reflecting persistent learning gaps in communities facing systemic barriers. See the Illinois Report Card – Statewide Trends.
• The Illinois State Board of Education notes that Illinois maintains rigorous proficiency standards, which can magnify gaps in districts serving higher‑need student populations. See ISBE Assessment Overview.

---

Naperville Community Unit School District 203 & Indian Prairie School District 204

Key strength: Far exceed state averages in ELA, Math, and Science. Key challenge: Persistent racial achievement gaps.

• District 203 and District 204 both report ELA, Math, and Science proficiency rates that are substantially above Illinois state averages on the Illinois Assessment of Readiness and SAT. See Illinois Report Card – Naperville CUSD 203 and Illinois Report Card – Indian Prairie CUSD 204.
• Both districts publicly acknowledge ongoing equity work to close achievement gaps for Black, Hispanic/Latinx, English learner, and low‑income students despite high overall performance. See District 203’s Equity & Inclusion and District 204’s Educational Equity pages.

---

Bolingbrook – Valley View Community Unit School District 365U

Key challenge: High minority enrollment and many economically disadvantaged students facing low academic proficiency.

• Valley View CUSD 365U, which serves Bolingbrook and Romeoville, reports below‑state‑average proficiency in ELA and Math on recent state assessments, alongside high rates of economic disadvantage. See Illinois Report Card – Valley View CUSD 365U.
• Bolingbrook schools show majority‑minority enrollment, with large Hispanic and Black student populations and a high percentage of students classified as low‑income, underscoring the need for targeted academic and wraparound supports. See school‑level data via the same Illinois Report Card district page above.

---

Plainfield Community Consolidated School District 202

Key strength: Performs near or slightly above state averages. Key challenge: Targeted support still needed for minority and low‑income students.

• District 202’s overall ELA and Math proficiency rates are generally near or modestly above Illinois state averages on the Illinois Assessment of Readiness and SAT. See Illinois Report Card – Plainfield CUSD 202.
• Subgroup data show persistent gaps for Hispanic, Black, English learner, and low‑income students, even where district‑wide averages appear solid—highlighting the need for targeted interventions. Subgroup breakdowns are available in the “Student Success” and “Student Characteristics” sections of the same report card.

---

Wheaton – Community Unit School District 200

Key strength: Moderate to high proficiency; among stronger‑performing districts in Illinois. Key challenge: Achievement gaps remain for low‑income and minority students.

• CUSD 200 reports ELA and Math proficiency rates that are well above state averages on recent state assessments. See Illinois Report Card – Wheaton CUSD 200.
• Despite strong overall performance, the district’s report card shows lower proficiency rates for low‑income, Hispanic, Black, and English learner students compared with White and non‑low‑income peers, indicating ongoing equity challenges. Subgroup data are available in the “Student Success” and “Student Characteristics” sections of the same report card.

---

West Chicago Elementary School District 33

Key challenge: Significant economic disadvantage and low proficiency rates among a predominantly Hispanic student population.

• District 33 reports ELA and Math proficiency rates that are below state averages, with a large share of students not yet meeting grade‑level standards on the Illinois Assessment of Readiness. See Illinois Report Card – West Chicago ESD 33.
• The district serves a predominantly Hispanic student population with high rates of economic disadvantage and a large proportion of English learners, reflecting deep systemic barriers that affect academic outcomes. These characteristics are detailed in the “Student Characteristics” section of the same report card.